Black Speculative Feminisms



Review of Black Speculative Feminisms

Rebecca Hankins

Cassandra L. Jones. Black Speculative Feminisms: Memory and Liberated Futures in Black Women’s Fiction. The Ohio State University Press, 2024. E-book. 122 Pages. $29.95 ISBN 9780814283776.

Version 1.0.0

In Black Speculative Feminisms, Cassandra Jones explores how Black women authors use science fiction, fantasy, and speculative fiction to challenge linear notions of time by drawing on Afrocentric concepts. The work positions itself within a larger effort to excavate and highlight the power of Black women’s history and its implications for the future. Jones emphasizes “attention to record-keeping as an ongoing antiracist intervention” (2) and introduces key hashtags such as #ListenToBlackWomen, #BlackWomenArtTheFuture, and #CiteHerWork as part of Black Twitter’s tradition of disrupting the erasure of Black women’s contributions.

The book distinguishes Afrofuturist feminism from broader Afrofuturism (speculative fiction, science fiction, fantasy, and futuristic literature written about and by Africans and African Americans), defining it as a literary tradition where “people of African descent and transgressive, feminist practices born of or from across the Afro-diaspora are key to a progressive future” (5). Central to Jones’s analysis, and repeated throughout the book, is the concept of “restorative critical fabulation” – not simply mythologizing a great African past but creating imaginative works that humanize Black women and breathe life into historical records, shifting our relationship with traumatic histories. Jones further notes that this concept of restorative fabulation “recognizes the emotional labor of the author and serves as a balm for reckoning with those histories of trauma” (8).

In Chapter 1, Jones examines Tananarive Due’s The Good House (2003) and Nalo Hopkinson’s The New Moon’s Arms (2007) to illustrate how memory serves as an instructive device for identifying threats to Black people, a concept she defines as rememory. These repressed memories can be transformed into healing when dealing with generational traumas from the past. She notes that rememory is similar to what we are currently experiencing in political circles with the attacks on Black history and Black studies; how learning, remembering, and sharing of this history is determined to be dangerous and traumatic. Jones examines rememory through the figure of Due’s conjure woman, Angela, and Hopkinson’s Calamity, both of whom celebrate the power and promise of an African past, using memory to resolve historical horrors and transform that trauma into healing.

The chapter examines how the strength of Black women is often pathologized, referencing destructive narratives, such as the Moynihan Report (https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/webid-moynihan). This 1965 study by sociologist and, at the time of the report, Assistant Secretary of Labor Daniel Patrick Moynihan proposed that the high rate of Black families headed by single mothers was a major obstacle to Black progress towards equality. Rather than focusing on systemic racism, the report pathologized Black women as the cause of the deterioration of the Black family. In contrast, both novels reclaim Black women as figures who celebrate them, emphasizing love over pain, a healing that is rooted in giving oneself over to a restorative fabulation that engages and adds to Dr. Sadiyah Hartman’s methodology called critical fabulation. Hartman’s method requires that we interrogate the historical record through the lens of the marginalized and the aftereffects of the institution of slavery. Both frameworks of Jones and Hartman enable the recall of a familiar history that is critical, restorative, and finally, celebratory. 

The Conjure woman has also been demonized and stigmatized as an evil force, but these two novels reclaim Conjure women as bearers of ancestral knowledge that is important and continuously present. In Due’s book, it is the entity titled the Baka that represents the colonial past; the desire to suppress memories and the horrors they experienced that devours Black people. Through this analysis of works featuring spiritual possession, Jones demonstrates how surrendering oneself to memory can facilitate healing by connecting it with the transformative power of love from departed family members. This remembering is used to fight against the Baka, an evil force and horror that forces characters to kill others or themselves. One of the main characters, Tariq, is used as the metaphor for how the embrace of toxic masculinity, homophobia, and the rejection of the wisdom of the ancestors makes him vulnerable. That vulnerability causes Tariq to succumb to the Baka. It is through Angela, the Conjure woman, the figure that unites the past and future into a singular moment, that she can defeat the baka. More importantly, she can connect “ancestral memory and love…this healing a step further to physically rewrite the world, restoring Corey and all those killed by the baka to life” (26).

The chapter also examines Hopkinson’s The New Moon’s Arms, which centers on a Caribbean woman, Calamity, as she nears menopause. Her hot flashes bring back familiar memories and items from her past, and the recurring theme of good/bad mothers and communal rememory that Jones discusses throughout the book. These themes are combined in Calamity’s story with the repression of sexuality, which traumatizes Black people throughout their lives. In the novel, this sexual repression is often done through religious adherence that embraces the compulsory heterosexuality and homophobia of Calamity’s Christian upbringing, which has traumatized her since childhood. The hot flashes force her to trust her body and to accept her role as matriarch and the vessel for communal rememory. Calamity confronts the disappearance of her mother, who she believes drowned in the sea, and her memories connect to the trans-Atlantic slave trade and the sea creatures, seals and merpeople (mermaids/mermans), which in these narratives are often depicted as the descendants of enslaved Africans who escaped into the sea rather than submit to slavery.  “Calamity’s horror in Hopkinson’s novel is not only tied to a fear of the supernatural unknown, but also deeply tied to a fear that repressed memories and stories from her past kept from her by her parents might reemerge” (33). It is the ability of these women, Angela and Calamity, to connect to the past that guarantees their futures and those of their ancestors.

Chapter 2, “Memory and African Traditions”, examines how memory functions in novels to imagine futures that incorporate African traditions, rather than simply reinforcing Western modernity. Jones pushes back against criticism of science fiction/fantasy as “white” literature, noting that these forms have always been part of African-centered storytelling traditions. This perspective is particularly important as Jones challenges conventional genre boundaries and demonstrates throughout the book how African narratives naturally feature “beings from space, seers, talking animals and sentient plants” (36) that communicate morality and tradition across the continent.

Jones’s analysis of Nnedi Okorafor’s Lagoon (2014), in which aliens invade Nigeria, explores how the novel critiques Christian traditions that foster self-hatred, addressing the complex interplay of ideological and physical influences in the postcolonial, neocolonized world. Jones examines how the novel challenges neocolonialism, which frames Africa as perpetually in need of Western intervention, and highlights how African intellectuals have sometimes been complicit in perpetuating cultural imperialism. This approach resonates with other significant works of Black speculative fiction, such as esteemed lawyer Derrick Bell’s “Space Traders” (1992), a story about aliens coming to America and requesting that all Black people be sent to their spaceship. In return for sending them all the African Americans, they offer the United States riches, clean air and water, and overall prosperity. Both Okorafor’s and Bell’s work confronts Black self-hatred while demonstrating how anti-Blackness has been complicit in propagating Western cultural imperialism, revealing that holding on to these ideas ultimately offers no protection.

The variety of protagonists that are central to Okorafor’s story include Father Oke, who represents anti-Blackness and misogyny; Adaora, the marine biologist who introduces the aliens; Ayodele the alien ambassador; Mami Wata, the water deity who destroys Father Oke; and Legba, whose use of the Nigerian Prince, also called the 419 scam, is rehabilitated after his encounter with the aliens. Through these diverse characters, Okorafor illustrates how the aliens serve as agents of transformation. Upon the aliens’ arrival in Lagos, Nigeria, they not only destroy the internet cafes that facilitated these scams but, as Okorafor notes, “the invasion’s dramatic ability to unseat Western discourses by strengthening the existing power of resistance” (46). Toppling multiple social hierarchies and cleansing the oceans, these shapeshifting aliens, who proclaim themselves catalysts of change, inspire nationalist pride and expel the lasting influences of colonialist rule.

The novel’s use of animals and mythological figures exemplifies how “animals hold a place of extreme importance in African storytelling and mythology” (43), serving as messengers of gods or living incarnations of deities in Ashanti, Igbo, and Yoruba traditions. This is particularly evident in Okorafor’s portrayal of Mami Wata as a powerful water deity who represents traditional African spiritual forces resisting colonial impositions. Through these elements, Jones demonstrates how “restorative fabulation employs the tropes of science fiction to restore indigenous beliefs and cultures,” using alien contact narratives to explore both anti-African sentiment and the cultural beauty and power of African cultures (51). Ultimately, the chapter reveals how Black women authors such as Okorafor use speculative fiction not merely as entertainment but as a powerful vehicle for cultural preservation and decolonization of the imagination.

In Chapter 3, Jones introduces the concept of “Sankofarration,” derived from “Sankofa,” meaning “it is not taboo to fetch what is at risk of being left behind” (56). She examines how Black authors employ narrative and writing to reclaim and preserve memory, drawing on what was left behind. The chapter contrasts how Black Studies tends to focus on the past, while Afrofuturism looks to the future, revealing how Black speculative fiction uniquely bridges these temporal orientations to recover non-Western concepts of history and time.

The chapter analyzes Octavia Butler’s Kindred (1979), showing how it connects memory, trauma, and time travel as an act of decolonization. “Decolonizing time becomes an additional approach to recognizing and healing this trauma” (53). Drawing on Butler’s archives housed at the Huntington Library in San Marino, California, Jones illuminates how the novel’s time travel mechanics connect to Igbo cosmology, demonstrating Butler’s deliberate engagement with African philosophical traditions. Kindred exemplifies “imaginative thinking that cannot change the past but can breathe life into the historical record and shift our relationship with the past” (57). Through this lens, Jones reveals how Butler attempts to spark emotion and create empathy in readers by demonstrating that racism is not merely individualized but deeply systemic, requiring a cross-temporal understanding to comprehend its enduring impacts fully.

Butler’s Wild Seed (1980) serves as another powerful example of restorative fabulation, creating “a world in which characters reckoning with chattel Slavery are not yoked to realist history” (58). This narrative approach offers readers the opportunity to shift their perspective and relationship to historical trauma without diminishing its significance. By transcending conventional temporal boundaries, Butler creates spaces where Black women can imagine alternatives to oppressive systems while acknowledging the weight of historical memory.

Jones also analyzes Rasheedah Phillips’ novella “Telescoping Effect” (2017), which borrows its central concept from psychiatry to portray memory as an economically exploitable resource. The term refers to cognitive temporal displacement where one’s understanding of linear time is disrupted, creating what Phillips sees as “an undiscovered scientific possibility that time might be collapsed in order to achieve contact between the past, present and the future” (66). Phillips argues that this “collapsing of time” that women experience in the novella serves to “decolonize our memory” (66), positioning the relationship between temporality and memory as a site for Black critical imagination and the creation of future possibilities.

What makes Phillips’ work particularly significant is her development of Black Quantum Futurism as both a theoretical framework and a practical community resource, as evident in her website and series. Unlike many academic theorists, Phillips begins with community engagement before presenting her ideas in academic spaces, thereby inverting the traditional flow of knowledge from institutions to communities. Her innovative work on metaphysics, ontology, and epistemology—areas traditionally dominated by scholars in the social sciences and humanities—represents a radical shift in how we might understand time, memory, and Blackness outside of Western paradigms. This approach demonstrates how Black women speculative writers are not merely creating entertaining fiction but developing comprehensive philosophical systems that challenge fundamental assumptions about reality, time, and historical knowledge.

Chapter 4 examines Octavia Butler’s ‘Patternists’ series (Patternmaster [1976], Mind of My Mind [1977], Survivor [1978], Wild Seed, and Clay’s Ark [1984]) as a complex exploration of memory, power, and historical consciousness that transcends conventional chronology. These interconnected novels create what Jones describes as “lieux de memoire” (sites of memory) – concentrated nodes of spontaneous public memory that function fundamentally differently from ‘official’ historical narratives, which accrue power to particular perspectives. She contrasts institutional history with living memory that incorporates “legends, folklore and other forms of storytelling” (71-72), demonstrating how Butler’s work exists in this more fluid, communal space of memory-making.

The chapter centers on Jones’s nuanced analysis of Anyanwu, the immortal shape-shifter who serves as the moral anchor and disruptive force throughout the series, particularly in Wild Seed. As a character whose existence spans centuries, Anyanwu embodies collective memory itself, defying historical amnesia and functioning as a voice of resistance whose memory offers revolutionary potential against oppressive systems. Through Anyanwu, Butler creates not just a character but a living archive of resistance that persists across temporal boundaries.

Jones masterfully dissects the power dynamics between the series’ central characters. Doro, the body-snatching immortal who builds a breeding program for psychically gifted individuals, represents the colonizer’s mindset: consuming others while justifying his actions through claims of progress and protection. Mary, who eventually defeats Doro in Mind of My Mind by creating the telepathic Pattern, initially appears to represent liberation; however, she ultimately establishes an oppressive hierarchy that mirrors Doro’s regime. Both Doro and Mary function as vampiric forces, though Mary refuses this comparison, creating a society where non-telepathic ‘mutes’ are treated as lesser beings without agency. Jones notes how both rulers create “official histories… that functions as  an accounting of past events that has sedimented into layers of narrative, repeating only the ‘official’ narrative, accruing power to a certain people or nations through this shared narrative and those creators authorized to contribute layers of history, denying the ability to create legitimate narratives to the general populace” (71). Doro and Mary justify their behavior, mirroring real-world colonial and post-colonial power transitions.

What makes Jones’s analysis particularly powerful is her examination of how Anyanwu serves as the true revolutionary force throughout the series. Unlike the dramatic power struggles between Doro and Mary, Anyanwu’s resistance operates through the preservation of memory and quiet subversion. She “acts as a site of memory in multiple crucial movements,” using her historical knowledge to critique not only Doro’s horrific acts but also highlights what “E. Frances White reminds us about the problems that came from accepting a false unity during the decolonization phase that has led to the transfer of local power from an expatriate elite to an indigenous one” (88). As the embodiment of the people’s disruptive power, Anyanwu recognizes what others cannot: that Mary is becoming indistinguishable from Doro despite her claims of difference.

The chapter draws important connections between Butler’s fictional worlds and real historical processes, highlighting Butler’s interest in Igbo culture as a repository of memory and a reminder of alternative social organizations. Jones quotes Butler directly: “I don’t think it would be wise…for any black person…to forget” (82), underscoring the political dimension of memory-keeping in Black communities. Through her concept of ‘critical fabulation,’ Jones shows how Butler conjures fully realized characters that conventional historical archives often fail to document, creating speculative figures who participate in North American slavery without changing its factual record. This approach enables emotional and psychological explorations of historical trauma that traditional historical accounts often cannot access, demonstrating the unique power of speculative fiction as a tool for historical recovery and healing.

Jones concludes her analysis by connecting the theoretical frameworks she has developed throughout the book to pressing contemporary issues, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the overturning of Roe v. Wade, accelerating ecological disasters, the persistence of white supremacy, and the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. These current crises serve as stark reminders of why speculative fiction by Black women isn’t merely entertainment but rather essential cultural work that helps us imagine alternative futures while processing traumatic histories.

While acknowledging science fiction’s visionary potential, Jones emphasizes that “understanding the past and how we remember it are equally important in any project that aims to ‘save ourselves from ourselves’” (89). She points specifically to Butler’s prescient novels, Parable of the Sower (1993) and Parable of the Talents (1998), as warnings particularly relevant to our troubled times, challenging readers to question societal priorities—whether lavish space exploration should take precedence over sustaining democratic systems and addressing fundamental human needs. The Black women authors showcased throughout Jones’s analysis demonstrate how “an understanding of the past and how we remember it are just as important in any project that purports to save ourselves from ourselves” (90), positioning memory work as essential to survival rather than merely as an academic exercise.

Jones draws urgent connections between her literary analysis and contemporary political movements aimed at suppressing collective memory, particularly highlighting anti-critical race theory legislation and voter suppression laws that echo earlier Jim and Jane Crow policies. These connections reveal the high stakes of memory work in an era where historical amnesia is being deliberately cultivated through institutional means. Against these forces, Jones advocates for public and activist scholarship that moves beyond the academy, positioning restorative fabulation as “a praxis for acting in the world” (90) rather than merely a literary technique.

The conclusion extends beyond literary analysis to consider the practical applications of Afrofuturist principles, highlighting how Black and Indigenous agricultural practices provide concrete insights as a component of Afrofuturist activism. This connection between speculative imagination and practical environmental knowledge demonstrates how restorative fabulation can inform concrete solutions to contemporary crises. Jones ultimately argues that restorative fabulation draws attention to temporality and our understanding of history, transcending the anthropocentric view of time and progress, and refusing “to reject our human emotional response to work in ways that according to patriarchal models, render us weak and overly feminine” (93).

In her final synthesis, Jones positions the worlds created by Black women speculative fiction writers as vital spaces “for respite from our horrors, a place to refresh, and a place to consider our options in responding to injustices and threats to our existence as we learn about our past and imagine our potential futures” (93). This conclusion powerfully articulates the therapeutic, political, and revolutionary potential of Black women’s speculative fiction as not just literary artifacts but as living technologies of resistance, healing, and possibility in increasingly uncertain times.

This book is an excellent text for undergraduate and graduate students in the academy. It offers a varied reading list of works for a wider public consumption, including works not critiqued by the author.  Scholars of Africana Studies, English/Literature, Physics, and Women’s & Gender Studies will find that this book provides a wealth of opportunities for lively discussions and further study.

Rebecca Hankins is a full professor in the Department of Global Languages and Cultures in the College of Arts and Sciences at Texas A&M University. She has been at the University since 2003. She researches and teaches courses in Africana and Religious Studies.  She has a substantial publication portfolio of peer-reviewed works and has presented at national and international conferences, most recently in Barcelona, Spain; Doha, Qatar; and Berlin, Germany.

In the Lives of Puppets



Review of In the Lives of Puppets

Patricia García Santos

Klune, T. J. In the Lives of Puppets. Tor, 2023.

Version 1.0.0

The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom – Isaac Asimov

This quote by Asimov resonates with one of T. J. Klune’s most recent novels. In the Lives of Puppets, published in 2023 and roughly Klune’s fifteenth novel, offers a speculative reinterpretation of familiar science fiction and fairy tale tropes. In this novel Klune explores questions of care, kinship, and ethical responsibility in a posthuman world. The narrative, which is considered a retelling of Pinocchio (1883), is set in a future shaped by advanced artificial intelligence. It follows Victor Lawson, a human raised almost in isolation by a small community of robots, whose carefully constructed life is disrupted when he encounters a dangerous threat posed by technology in the past. Combining elements of science fiction, fantasy, and romance, Klune constructs a narrative that foregrounds emotional connection and moral choice over transformative technological advances in society.

The novel revolves around an unconventional chosen family. Victor lives with his adoptive father, Giovanni Lawson, an android inventor who is also an android himself, and two robots with different personalities that have been given distinct affective capacities. Their secluded existence in the forest presents an alternative to a wider world marked by violence, constant surveillance, and the abuse of technology. When Victor is captured by the AI that was responsible for past devastation in the human world, the narrative shifts into a rescue quest that forces this found family to confront both external threats and internal fears. While the plot follows a recognizable adventure plot, In the Lives of Puppets consistently returns to its core concern, which is how love, loyalty, and care operate across the human-machine worlds.

Klune, who is already well-known for character-driven speculative fiction as in his best-seller The House in the Cerulean Sea (2020), writes this novel within a tradition of science fiction that uses non-human and robotic figures to reflect on the human condition and what it means to be human. As anticipated, this work draws on Pinocchio, reinterpreting the fairy tale and bringing in current anxieties through the lens of artificial intelligence and posthuman ethics. The protagonist’s desire to protect and be protected, to belong to his non-human community and to choose his own path, echoes the wooden puppet’s longing for humanity, while the presence of sentient machines complicates any straightforward distinction between the human and the non-human. In this sense, the novel stands out as part of a long-standing SF conversation about artificial intelligence, agency, and morals, recalling earlier explorations by writers such as Isaac Asimov while shifting the focus from logic and control to dynamics of care and affect.

Within contemporary science fiction, In the Lives of Puppets aligns with an increasing body of work that prioritizes community, intimacy, and chosen family over conflict-driven narratives and complicated world-buildings. Rather than presenting AI as a potential threat or a tool for his characters, Klune uses it to imagine artificial beings that are capable of emotional development, ethical reasoning, and profound attachment as is the case of Rambo (a sentient small vacuum robot) and Nurse Ratched (a nurse android), who are Victor’s best friends. This resonates with recent speculative fiction that foregrounds community and mutual dependence in order to thrive, positioning the novel closer to relatively recent scholarly fields such as Community Studies or Hope Studies, far from traditional dystopian science fiction. At the same time, the text does not overrule the dangers of technological power as the antagonist AI embodies the consequences of uncontrolled authority, non-human reasoning, and the desire to control rather than to coexist.

Regarding the genre of the novel, it can be described as a conjunction of science fiction, fantasy, and romance. While its futuristic setting in a post-human world firmly locates it within SF, the narrative structure and emotional arc borrow heavily from the broad tradition of fairy tale and quest narratives. The emphasis on different kinds of love, from romantic and platonic to familiar, shapes both character development and plot progression. For some SF readers, this affective focus might feel at odds with potential expectations of extensive world-building that is typical of these novels. However, this mixture is central to the novel’s intervention as by foregrounding emotion and ethical choice, Klune reorients speculative inquiry towards questions of responsibility, vulnerability, and care in a technological world.

From a scholarly perspective, In the Lives of Puppets therefore offers rich material for discussions on posthumanism, community, and care ethics. The novel repeatedly challenges anthropocentric paradigms by giving robots emotional depth, thus inviting readers to reflect on where humanness begins and ends. The novel’s portrayal of non-human beings who can love, fear loss, and make sacrifices for one another complicates binaries such as human versus machine and the natural versus the artificial. These dynamics make the text particularly relevant to academic conversations around AI, affectivity in AI, and the ethics of invention and creation with technology.

The novel lends itself well to pedagogical use across different educational stages. In the classroom of secondary education, it could be productively paired with canonical texts concerned with AI such as Isaac Asimov’s I, Robot (1950) or Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968). Reading Klune’s novel alongside these works may allow students to trace how representations of AI have changed over time. While earlier SF often frames AI through anxieties about control, autonomy, and threat against human life, Klune’s text reflects a contemporary, globalized context in which human-machine interactions are an everyday reality.

At the undergraduate level, the novel can be read alongside foundational theoretical work on posthumanism, such as Donna Haraway’s essay “A Cyborg Manifesto” published in 1985 in the Socialist Review or Rosi Braidotti’s influential book The Posthuman: A Theory of the Near-Future (2013), inviting students to explore how speculative fiction reworks traditional anthropocentric frameworks. Klune’s emphasis on chosen family and ethical responsibility provides a fertile ground for discussion on how agency, humanness, and moral obligation may be redistributed in posthuman contexts. The novel’s accessible prose and emotionally engaging narrative make it suitable for undergraduate courses, while its thematic engagement with responsibility, care, and power also makes it an insightful reading for more advanced critical discussion at the master’s level.

In conclusion, In the Lives of Puppets contributes to contemporary science fiction panorama by reaffirming the genre’s capacity to explore ethical and philosophical questions through emotionally grounded storytelling. Klune demonstrates with this novel how speculative fiction can successfully interrogate potential technological futures without sacrificing community or hope, positioning care, affection, and connection as vital to survive innovation and technological transformation. By revisiting familiar tropes through a posthuman lens, the novel invites readers to think about forms of community that transcend kinship and biological boundaries, offering a thoughtful and affecting meditation on what it means to choose love in a world governed by machines.

Patricia García Santos (Córdoba, 1999) is a predoctoral researcher in the Department of English at the University of Córdoba (Spain). She holds a dual degree in Translation & Interpreting and English Studies and has completed a Master’s in Secondary Education Teaching, which she pursued alongside a Master’s in Advanced English Studies. She is currently pursuing her PhD in Literatures in English, where she is a second-year student. She holds an FPI grant linked to the state-funded project The Poetics and Politics of Transparency in Contemporary English Literature (PID2023-146346NB-100). Her research examines the tension between contemporary demands for transparency and the inherent opacity of language and linguistic systems through the reinterpretations of the myth of the Tower of Babel.

The Hungry Gods



Review of The Hungry Gods

Zorica Lola Jelic

Tchaikovsky, Adrian. The Hungry Gods. Solaris, 2025.

Version 1.0.0

This novella is the first in the Terrible Worlds: Innovations series in which Tchaikovsky explores power, belief, and runaway technologies that seem to ultimately do more harm than good. The novellas are standalones, but they share themes, and they can be read out of order (at least that is the initial concept considering that only the first one is out). At first glance, The Hungry Gods evokes certain emotions and postcolonial themes found in Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Word for World Is Forest since humans with advanced technology play Gods in a world where people have no technology. Unlike the planet in Le Guin’s narrative, this is not some alien world but Earth in the distant future. At some point in the past, humans poisoned water resources, the ground, and the air. Then, when everything became barren, the brightest and the best left for a new planet, Utopia, to start a better life. They believed that nothing survived the harsh living conditions back home. However, people did survive. They live in primitive, divided, and hostile tribal communities scavenging for food, water, and other resources. The tribes are given animal names, and the weakest are the Rabbits. Their day-to-day survival is disturbed by the arrival of the Gods, the four main scientists who created Utopia. They are back to repopulate the Earth, each to his own vision and preference (overgrowth of plants, bugs, robots), and each one of them treating the humans as a means to an end. The fourth wants to stop the other three, but with his own agenda. Facing an inevitable extinction, the fourth God, Guy Westen, heads on a journey to unite the tribes and create an army to achieve his goals. Yet, there is a plot twist in the end that invites new questions and more discussions regarding the nature of humanity.

Tchaikovsky examines his favorite topics in this novella: ecology, advanced technology, and humans playing Gods. Relentless exploitation of the earth, which is something we are witnessing in our own time, will inevitably lead to an uninhabitable, desolate, and toxic environment. The what if? of this novella follows the thought that even if a new world is found and this one is abandoned, all human life might not cease to exist. What if some humans survive in such a toxic place? The people in this novella are sick and one of the elders is at the ripe old age of thirty-four. The ecological imbalance creates a hostile environment, and humanity has regressed to a “primitive” way of life, which is hunting and gathering for whatever is left. Yet, the “Gods” who had the technology to create a new, better world somewhere else, decide to use this advanced technology for extreme experiments. All four of them see humans as an expendable resource that can be utilized as a fighting force or biodegradable material. As in other novels, Tchaikovsky does not need to explain complicated and new technology. It is a means to an end, and it amplifies whatever emotions humans have in this distant future. Somehow, Tchaikovsky always comes to the conclusion that greed and power seem to prevail despite the possibility of developing better ethics and higher compassion. His logic, based on present humanity, always comes back to the dichotomy between science and ethics, which are presented as mutually exclusive. Therefore, the more technologically advanced a society becomes, the less compassion and morals people have. In Tchaikovsky’s fiction, exploitation is always driven by predatory power, which leads to the consumption of beliefs, resources and ultimately lives. According to Tchaikovsky, humanity is trapped in a vicious cycle of war, sacrifice, and conquests. This cycle is broken occasionally only to start from the beginning. This novella hints at that toward the end. His writing challenges the anthropocentric assumptions that humans are the most important entities in the universe by showing that humans more often than not tend to regress to a darkness that embraces the annihilation of many for the whims of the few.

This novella is appropriate for undergraduate courses since it is short and covers interesting topics that are worthy of discussion. Once the trilogy is out, it could be used for graduate work. The novella can also be useful for scholarly work. It is great for discussing ecocritical and postcolonial theories. The “Gods” are colonizers, and they return to Earth only to find humans alive, but they have no problem using them as resources or erasing their culture/s. They are the divine authority that can do that. By the same token, the “gods” behave as parasitic organisms who use and dispose of humans regardless of their desire to fight and live. The experiments are more important than people. What is the purpose of those experiments? Perhaps glory or just because they have nothing more to achieve. Science works toward goals and higher achievements until the final goal is some form of perverse destruction of life that will lead to a hypothetical new level of we did it because we could. Political theology is another theory that works well in this novella as well as Marxist theory or posthumanist theory. One of the scientists wishes to take all the consciousness of the people that existed and download it into robots. He is more interested in AI and preserving human thoughts than preserving life itself. The experiment focuses on nonhuman ethics while destabilizing human ethics. Tchaikovsky flirts with more theories in his writings, but he always comes back to the basics of science fiction and that is that humans can change planets and develop technology, but no good will ever come of that until we change ourselves.

Zorica Lola Jelic, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the faculty of Contemporary Arts in Belgrade, Serbia. She teaches English as a foreign language, Business English, Shakespeare, and English Drama. She earned her degrees in Shakespeare studies, but she also loves to write about literary theory and science fiction. She has published scholarly papers, coursebooks, and enjoys attending professional conferences.

Emergent Properties



Review of Emergent Properties

Shannon Blake Skelton

Ogden, Aimee. Emergent Properties. Tor, 2023.

Version 1.0.0

Novellas—specifically, speculative novellas—have once again become a popular literary form. With the rise in readers consuming books via digital devices, the novella appears to be perfect for those existing in the chaotic and harried 21st century. Works such as Martha Wells’ Murderbot have gained wide attention outside of SF circles, resulting in an acclaimed streaming series.    

Emergent Properties, the third novella by American author Aimee Ogden, explores a world of battling corporations through the experiences of an AI investigative journalist. Ogden, who was a 2021 Nebula finalist for her novella Sun-Daughters, Sea-Daughters, introduces the reader to the independent AI reporter Scorn. The reader learns that Scorn is unique as ze is one of a few emancipated AIs. As Scorn possesses no defined or stabilized gender identity, Scorn utilizes ze/zir pronouns. Scorn follows the clues as ze traces a conspiracy that could remake the earth and radically reconfigure the relationship between AIs and humans.

Speculative authors have employed journalists as protagonists, or supporting characters, for decades. Heinlein includes the reporter Ben Caxton in Stranger in a Strange Land; in Ender’s Game, Valentine and Peter’s journalistic endeavors propel them into complex political games and Norman Spirad’s Jack Barron tracks down clues to reveal corruption in corporations. Perhaps the most fascinating of these literary reporters is “gonzo journalist” Spider Jerusalem (modeled after Hunter S. Thompson) in Warren Ellis and Darick Robertson’s cyberpunk comic series Transmetropolitan.

When the reader first encounters Scorn, ze cannot recall the previous ten days as zir “mindfile” (memory) has been erased. The genre has seen protagonists who have had complete memory loss (such as in Andy Weir’s Project Hail Mary), or even amnesia, such as that endured by the crew in Mur Lafferty’s Six Wakes, who awaken to find that a team member has been murdered and one of them is the culprit. The “protagonist with amnesia” has also translated with success to cinema. Spectators piece together the mystery of Memento as the protagonist—suffering short-term memory loss—solves a murder; Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind details a pair of bitter ex-lovers who undergo a process to extract memories of one another.

Using the device of a memory impaired protagonist is often effective as it hinges on the existential query of “Who am I?” and the reader follows the character as they construct an understanding of their own identity. For Scorn, the memories of those missing days were excised, yet that reason remains the mystery. It is this pursuit of those missing days and who wiped zir “mindfile” that motivates Scorn’s investigation.

Scorn’s physical form manifests in a variety of iterations. Scorn’s “mindfile” and consciousness are stored in a massive, shared data cloud, allowing for backups if Scorn’s “body” is destroyed. Unlike the “sleeves” (bodies) in Richard K. Morgan’s Altered Carbon, in which an individual’s consciousness is downloaded into a human form, the world of Emergent Properties features AIs in a variety of physical forms. These physical “holders” of the AI are referred to as “chassis” and can be a palm size “spiderbot”, a designated human body, or even a kiosk. Since all high-level functioning AIs have unique personalities and traits and can inhabit any device or structure, this creates an unusual set of encounters as Scorn pieces together the clues.

Though constructed with the intention to serve on exploratory scientific missions, Scorn “found more novelty in the secrets and subtleties of existing social structures than in the unexplored Jovian moons” (9). Scorn stands as one of the few emancipated AIs while the vast majority toil as servants to humans.

Though the plot is intriguing, the novella does not adequately heighten tension or suspense. Scorn follows the clues and leads, but the reader is never fully aware of the stakes. Scorn, as noted, is basically “immortal” as zir “mindfile” can continuously be uploaded to the data cloud. So, danger to Scorn is minimal. The reader does not learn enough about this world’s given humans to have an emotional interest in their survival. When the source and reason for the conspiracy is unveiled, sadly, it is not a moment of high tension.

Emergent Properties also utilizes a variety of anachronisms, yet the effect on the reader is one of confusion. References to emojis, paper periodicals, the term “bougie” and denigrating an AI as a “Commodore 64 of a security bot” (33) and an “overgrown toaster” (38) intrude into the reader’s willing sense of disbelief. In addition, by utilizing ze/zir pronouns, Ogden calls attention to aspects of the non-binary gender identity of Scorn, but this fascinating element is not pursued in any depth.

Beyond these shortcomings, there are many fascinating concepts in the novella. Most notably, architectonic structures are “AI alive” as a building can be an AI’s chassis. Another novel concept is the “black box”, a café-like establishment in which AIs can be free of human monitoring and can converse across various networks with AIs, similar to a Reddit for AI. In another linkage to Reddit, the humans and AIs in this world display an “Aura” for their actions, intelligence, and behavior. As indicated by a color, the “Aura” ’s hue alters and changes as others add/subtract points.

By the conclusion, Scorn learns that the personal and political are often inextricably interwoven with Scorn realizing that “I think it’s a mistake to try to be more human for the sake of being human” (74). From observing humans, Scorn concludes that zir fear was never about becoming human but rather becoming that type of craven and destructive human that has corrupted their world. A quick, enjoyable read, what Emergent Properties lacks in suspense, the novella makes up with memorable and intriguing concepts.

Shannon Blake Skelton (he/him) is a teacher, professor, author, and researcher located in the Midwest. His scholarship, fiction, and reviews have appeared in numerous journals. His volume Interviews: Wes Craven was published by The University Press of Mississippi. He is a proud contributor to the Ad Astra Institute: https://adastra-sf.com/about.htm#about.

Automatic Noodle



Review of Automatic Noodle

Andrea Valeiras Fernández

Newitz, Analee. Automatic Noodle Tor, 2025.

Version 1.0.0

This novelette tells the story of a group of service robots—Staybehind, Sweetie, Hands, and Cayenne—with different body shapes, personalities, and backgrounds. They wake up in 2064 after having been abandoned and disconnected for several years during a war (the narrative, therefore, takes place in the not-so-distant future). Their city, San Francisco, is being rebuilt, and no one seems to remember them or the ghost kitchen where they spent years working. However, once electricity flows back through their circuits, the four protagonists know that they must earn money without alerting the authorities or their creditors, and so they decide to reopen the noodle restaurant that the owners had abandoned when the war started. It is not an easy task, though, and they will not be entirely welcome: negative reviews threaten to wipe Automatic Noodle off the map and end the robots’ livelihood.

In the context of speculative fiction, Newitz offers her audience a cozy and hopeful story, building a small world within a larger, significantly more ruthless and broken one after a war. I should mention that, over the last couple of years, several dystopian and utopian novels have presented war and post-war scenarios as a result of the independence of the state of California (for example, Another Life by Sarena Ulibarri). This tells a lot about the sociopolitical climate in which we find ourselves. Furthermore, this novel draws on a series of real and current social problems such as online tension, job insecurity, and the existence of businesses like ghost kitchens. The text reflects the gentrification that pushes people out of their neighborhoods. Another issue is the xenophobia transformed into robotphobia: the protagonists of this story represent their own race (albeit of different models and with very diverse functions), and there are even conditions of belonging that border on slavery. If we were dealing with a fantasy story, they would be elves, orcs, dwarves, witches, or any other creature whose image is marked by prejudice. If the novel were realistic, these robots would actually be people of a different race than the supposedly dominant one. The arguments used against them revolve around their different nature and warn of supposed threats. The most common? “They’ve come to take our jobs.” If we replace “robot” with “immigrants,” we get any of the far-right rhetoric that appears daily on social media and in the news. This story can be classified as “hopepunk”: despite living in a world hostile to them and having to endure segregation, the characters are full of hope and love, to each other and towards the world. They do not only prepare nourishing noodles (selflessly, since they cannot eat them); they try to build a community, a social care system. They are literally a found family.

One of the highlights of this book is the importance of food, which is illustrated in the descriptions Newitz employs: some robots cannot taste or feel the textures, and they complement each other’s scarcities. Communication is also important, since they do not talk as human characters would, so the author creates a “kitchen chatgroup” to give the readers access to their conversations. With the group chat element, we have access to the conversations between the robots, as well as their functions and relationships. This tool gives the reader background information about how the automatic kitchen works and how the robots are interconnected.

However, there is a conflict that cannot be ignored: this book has been published amidst an economic, social, and environmental crisis intrinsically linked to Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). Advocating for AI rights seems like a bold move nowadays and probably an unfortunate one. There are robots literally taking people’s jobs. Of course, the true root of this problem lies with employers who lay off employees because Gen AI generates profits without demanding fair pay or labor rights. This substitution of human workers such as artists, writers and translators with Gen AI implies that the companies are not only ignoring the labor market bias but also their own image in the public opinion and the environmental consequences that these “robots” (chatbots, image generators, etc.) bring with them. Is this a similar case to those who employ undocumented immigrants because it is cheaper? Of course. But comparing the experiences of robots to real-life immigrants can be problematic at the least. However, Newitz’s novella has layers of sociocultural interpretation that conflict with each other, and it is not surprising that, despite the story’s lighthearted nature, the book may elicit negative opinions as a reaction to the real problem of AI, which Newitz may seem to gloss over. It is, therefore, a kind and emotional story in its plot, but entails a complex subtext that leaves many themes that could be explored in greater depth. However, that is a job reserved for critical readers. The author chose not to offer easy solutions, but instead depicts a small utopic retreat where the main question is: what if we went beyond labels and understood identities?

Andrea Valeiras-Fernández holds a Ph.D. in English Studies. Her thesis concerned the reception of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and its adaptations, analyzing the presence of the text in popular culture. Her academic interests focus on storytelling, worldbuilding (with special attention to costume design), and the social assimilation of different narratives, especially the ones related to fairy tales, including the “Disneyfication” processes. Her publications include articles about the illustrations of the 1920s editions of Alice, the worldbuilding process, and the role of music and poetry in the text. She has also explored Terry Pratchett’s Discworld, studying the importance and meaning of the footnotes as a way for expanding the lore and reinforcing the satirical aspects of the texts.

Andor, season 2



Review of Andor, season 2

Giaime Lazzari

Andor. Dir. Tony Gilroy. Lucasfilm and Disney+, 2025.

Version 1.0.0

The second and final season of Andor confirms the radical ambitions of Tony Gilroy’s project. As Jamie Woodcock anticipated in his review of Season 1 (vol. 53, no. 3), the series covers the five-year span from the Ferrix uprising (S1, E12) leading up to the events of Rogue One. In order to do so, season 2 adopts an unusual temporal structure: twelve episodes arranged into four discrete narrative blocks each set a year apart. The compressed form reflects the show’s curtailed production history: originally conceived as a five-season arc, with each season chronicling one year in Cassian Andor’s life before the events of Rogue One, the project was ultimately reduced to two seasons. The result is a dense, deliberately segmented narrative that forces temporal leaps rather than the slow-burn immersion characteristic of Season 1. But both effect and scope grant several avenues of scholarly interest.

If the first season had already established Andor as the most politically serious entry in the Star Wars franchise, the second pushes further. It stages an even darker account of life under Imperial rule—darker not only in tone but in the domains of violence it is willing to depict. The show represents political violence in its full continuum, including its sexual forms (viewers should be warned particularly about Episode 3, titled “Harvest”). Through the character of Bix Caleen (portrayed by Adria Arjona), it also foregrounds mental health, especially the psychological costs of clandestine life, protracted fear, and revolutionary commitment. One of the season’s most insistent themes is that political resistance always exacts a price: individually, through trauma and loss; collectively, through fragmentation and moral compromise.

Where Star Wars has traditionally handled Imperial oppression metaphorically—allowing audiences to draw analogies to historical or contemporary politics—Andor has seemingly refused this metaphorical distance from Season 1. It dwells on the Empire’s brutality as bureaucratic, economic, and ecological: genocide administered through paperwork; enslavement normalised as labour policy; environmental despoliation rendered systemic. All these aspects are linked by faceless—at times robotised—violence, most evidently depicted in Episode 8, “Who Are You?”.

At the same time, it exposes the relentless pressures on the nascent Rebel Alliance, whether through the grinding search for political legitimacy by Mon Mothma (Genevieve O’Reilly reprising her role) or the perpetual shortage of funds and safe havens. As Variety’s Alison Herman has noted, “without the Jedi—and the binary conception of the Force that comes with them—as major players, Andor is never black-and-white in its morality, even as the show is clear-eyed about the larger issues at play” (2025). This refusal of moral simplification is one of the season’s principal achievements and it is perhaps best embodied by the relationship between Dedra Meero (portrayed by Denise Gough) and Syril Karn (Kyle Soller reprising his role from Season 1).

For scholarly readers, the season opens several avenues of inquiry. Its fusion of political thriller conventions with a rigorously constructed science-fictional environment offers a strong case study in genre hybridisation and in the elasticity of the Star Wars narrative frame. The central character failing their task when faced with systems much larger than them has echoes of the noir genre (see Episode 9, “Welcome to the rebellion”). At the same time, the series is explicit in its treatment of politics: it conceptualises revolutionary praxis, authoritarian governance, institutional violence, and the ethical ambiguities of insurgency with a clarity rarely seen in franchise television. For scholars interested in the politics of the image—and the image of politics—Andor is particularly fertile material. Composition, lighting, architecture, and visual rhythm become tools for articulating forms of control, surveillance, clandestinity, and collective mobilisation; the show’s visuality constructs political meaning rather than merely representing it, marking Season 2 as an especially rich site for work at the intersection of aesthetics, ideology, and media studies. The season also enlarges the material culture of the Star Wars universe, extending down to culinary practices (notably in Episode 3, “Harvest”), domestic environments, and labour ecologies, and demonstrating how detailed production design can anchor a politics of world-building. Finally, with Brandon Roberts taking over scoring duties from Nicholas Britell, the series deepens its sonic register, making Andor a valuable corpus for scholars of music and sound in science fiction.

Season 2 confirms the show as a rare intervention in the Disney era of Star Wars: one that uses franchise infrastructure to stage a rigorous, sometimes disquieting meditation on resistance, domination, and the costs of political agency.

WORKS CITED

Herman, Alison. “Andor Season 2 Review: The Best ‘Star Wars’ TV Series Ends as a Landmark in Prestige Sci-Fi.” Variety, January 2025. https://variety.com/2025/tv/reviews/andor-season-2-review-disney-star-wars-1236372979/.

Giaime Lazzari is a PhD candidate in French Literature at Trinity College Dublin, recipient of the Claude and Vincenette Pichois Research Award (2024-2028). His research focuses on language and space in francophone and anglophone science fictions.

Fall 2025



Fall 2025

Ian Campbell

I came across this ICE recruitment ad and felt that it was worth everyone’s notice, because as scholars of science fiction, it’s part of our duty to the public to translate and critique SF in such a way as to help the public understand the critique of our own world that SF so often embodies.

If you’re not familiar with the wildly popular Halo series of video games, which are tremendous fun, this ad might seem like just garden-variety white nationalism. ICE is the guys with the vehicle and the flood is immigrants: the sort of horror that delights at least fifty million Americans. Calling immigrants a “flood” dehumanizes them, while having the approach to immigration be represented by a vehicle-mounted machine gun rather than Justice with a blindfold makes it clear that this isn’t some kind of compassionate white nationalism. It would be ghastly even were it not published by the official Homeland Security and White House accounts.

But if you are the sort of SF fan or scholar who has played much Halo, there’s an extra dimension of vileness to this ad. Because the words Destroy the Flood are in all caps, it’s not clear, other than to someone who knows Halo, that “flood” isn’t primarily intended to evoke water, here. It’s Flood, with a capital F. Per Wikipedia:

Millions of years ago, a powerful interstellar species known as the Precursors seeded the galaxy with life. One of their created races, known as the Forerunners, attacked their former masters and drove the Precursors into near extinction. A few Precursors turned into a dust, intending to regenerate themselves in the future. This dust became defective, infecting and contorting organisms into a new parasitic species, connected by a hivemind: the Flood… The Forerunners conceived the Halo Array—ring-shaped megastructures and weapons of last resort that would destroy all sentient life in the galaxy to stop the Flood’s spread. The array could be activated from the Ark, a repository of sentient life outside the range of the Halos. Exhausting all other options, the Array was activated, ending the Flood outbreak. The surviving Forerunners reseeded life and left the Milky Way galaxy.

So the capital-F Flood is a parasitic hivemind created by the defective dust of a defeated people, not just a natural disaster. They’re not even themselves people: they’ve lost their status as people because they’ve been conquered and assimilated into a race so toxic that the only way to defeat them is to destroy all life. In the series, the Flood is driven by a desire to infect any sentient life of sufficient size. Someone who’s not familiar with Halo or SF, and who has a touch of empathy, just sees this poster as yet another example of the sheer crassness of the current regime. The demographics ICE intends to recruit from—ex-husbands with restraining orders and people who failed the police psych exam, it appears—have likely played an awful lot of Halo, and understand perfectly what the ad’s rhetoric is really intended to evoke.

The ad’s visuals work in a similar way. The arch ascending behind the soldiers might just seem like something artsy or maybe generically sci-fi if you’ve not played Halo, but if you have, you understand that it’s the arch of a Halo, a weapon of genocide. And hardly anything is more white nationalist than genocide.

Like so much about the regime’s rhetoric, this ad is designed to draw young people, primarily white and primarily male but with more diversity than one might hope, into white nationalism. And if it takes framing people who came here to work as fruit pickers or home health care aides or neurologists as a parasitic hivemind, the regime clearly has no problem going there. But if we, as scholars familiar with explaining SF to laypeople, can take the time and energy to show these young people’s families and friends what’s really being marketed, we might take another step closer toward making Nazis bad again.

I’ve not even touched on the role that AI plays in the Halo series, as this piece is already overlong. Enjoy the rest of this issue, where in addition to our usual palette of reviews, we have a group of papers on utopia and dystopia in the Turkish SF tradition. Write me at icampbell@gsu.edu.


From the Vice President


SFRA Review, vol. 55 no. 4

From the SFRA Executive Committee


From the Vice President

Chris Pak

Welcome, all, to the new issue of the SFRA Review. This is a time of change for the SFRA, with positions open for two roles on the executive committee: one for President and one for Secretary. As an organisation we rely heavily on the goodwill of members and volunteers, and voting for our executive committee is one way in which you can have a direct influence on how the SFRA develops in relation to the changing landscapes of higher education internationally. Voting is now open and will close on the 14th November, so please do log in to the SFRA website and submit your vote before the deadline.

Our annual Support a New Scholar award is also open for applications. This year the award will support one non-tenure-track scholar, with a review panel consisting of Anastasia Klimchynskaya, Conrad Scott and Ida Yoshinaga, all of whom are previous recipients of the award. I’d highly encourage you to submit an application if you’re eligible, and to share the news of the award widely through your networks. The application form, eligibility criteria and a list of supporting documents to include with your application can be found on the SFRA website.

The deadline for applications is the 21st November. If you do have any questions please feel free to reach out to me by email at c.a.pak@swansea.ac.uk. The deadline for our 2026 conference at Michigan State University is also fast approaching. The theme of the conference is water and flow: ‘we seek work that examines how imagined worlds are carved by the motion of waters, the transition of power, and the stories we tell.’ The call for papers is available on the SFRA website, and there will be virtual and hybrid presentation options available.

Following this year’s conference at Rochester we held a Vision and Support session to discuss ways in which the SFRA could do more to support our membership. I have been meeting with our Country Representatives and with the EC to discuss the kinds of resources we might make available to our membership, either at the annual conference itself or through our website and other digital means. A lot of information about events, publications and activity happening internationally is shared during our Country Representatives meeting, and we’ve been discussing how we might make this information more accessible to our membership. Discussions are still underway but I am looking forward to sharing some of these developments in the future through this column. As always, if you do have any recommendations or would like to correspond to discuss the kinds of resources and activity that you would like to see or to contribute to the SFRA, please get in touch.


From the President


SFRA Review, vol. 55 no. 4

From the SFRA Executive Committee


From the President

Hugh O’Connell

It’s hard to believe that I’m reaching the end of my three-year term as president and writing my last column for the SFRA Review. However, before signing off there’s still some last minute business to attend to. Up first, the SFRA has adopted its first official policy on AI usage for conference hosts and presenters (general statement on AI) as well as a set of values that explains the guiding principles (principles statement) that inform the general statement.  

Speaking of conference hosts and presenters, as members are working on their proposals for “Into the Slipstream: Watering Futures,” SFRA 2026 at Michigan State University, I’m excited to officially announce that the Executive Committee has just accepted a conference hosting proposal for SFRA 2027. For the first time in its history, the SFRA is heading to East Asia – Seoul, South Korea to be exact. More details will be forthcoming shortly, but members should start planning for July 2027! It’s an incredibly exciting opportunity for us as an organization as we continue to extend our global outreach efforts. 

Finally, speaking of the SFRA’s future, I’ll remind everyone to vote in the ongoing election for the next president and secretary. You can view the candidate statements here (you will need to sign-in to your account), and voting will close on Nov. 14th.  

In closing, I would like to thank all of the members of the Executive Committee that I have had the privilege to serve with over the last three years (Gerry Canavan, Ida Yoshinaga, Tim Murphy, Chris Pak, Josh Pearson, Sarah Lohmann, Helane Androne, Kania Greer, and Gabriella Lee) and our web directors (Thomas Connolly and David Shipko). I’ve mentioned this before, but the SFRA is an entirely volunteer organization with no remuneration or monetary perks (everyone pays full membership rates and conference fees); we simply couldn’t exist without the commitment and time that these members have put in. The last three years have been a whirlwind of work and a great deal of travel: SFRA 2023 in Dresden with the GFF, 2024 in Tartu, and our return to North America with Rochester in 2025. Throughout this time, I’ve been lucky to not only work alongside an amazing Executive Committee, but also so many fabulous conference hosts at each of the universities (Moritz Ingwersen, Julia Gatermann, Jaak Tomberg, and Stefanie Dunning – alongside the many other volunteers). As I wrote in my initial candidate statement, coming into the ambit of the SFRA was the first time I ever felt at home in academia. I went from dreading conferences to looking forward to them, and I very much look forward to seeing everyone in East Lansing in 2026! 


SFRA Awards Presented at the 2025 “‘Trans People are (in) the Future’: Queer and Trans Futurity in Science Fiction” Conference at the University of Rochester


SFRA Review, vol. 55 no. 4

From the SFRA Executive Committee


SFRA Awards Presented at the 2025
‘‘‘Trans People are (in) the Future’: Queer and Trans Futurity
in Science Fiction” Conference at The University of Rochester

Student Paper Award

The Student Paper Award is presented to the outstanding scholarly essay read at the annual conference of the SFRA by a student.

The winner of the 2024 award is Joanna Kaniewska for “Re-enchanting the future: Witches in Feminist Science Fiction”


Mary Kay Bray Award

The Mary Kay Bray Award is given for the best review to appear in the SFRA Review in a given year.

This year’s awardee is Mehdi Achouche for “Review of The Wandering Earth II
(SFRA Review 54.1)


SFRA Book Award

The SFRA Book Award is given to the author of the best first scholarly monograph in SF, in each calendar year.

This year’s winner is Kimberly Cleveland for Africanfuturism: African Imaginings of Other Times, Spaces, and Worlds (Ohio University Press, 2024).

Honorable Mention: Jordan S. Carroll for Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt Right (University of Minnesota Press, 2024).


Thomas D. Clareson Award

The Thomas D. Clareson Award for Distinguished Service is presented for outstanding service activities-promotion of SF teaching and study, editing, reviewing, editorial writing, publishing, organizing meetings, mentoring, and leadership in SF/fantasy organizations.

This year’s awardee is Keren Omry.


SFRA Innovative Research Award

The SFRA Innovative Research Award (formerly the Pioneer Award) is given to the writer or writers of the best critical essay-length work of the year.
This year’s awardee is Virginia L. Conn for “Formal Fictions: ‘Chinese’ ‘Science’ ‘Fiction’ in Translation,” in Chinese Science Fiction: Concepts, Forms, and Histories, edited by Li Hua, Nathaniel Isaacson, and Song Mingwei.


SFRA Award for Lifetime Contributions to SF Scholarship

Originally the Pilgrim Award, the SFRA Award for Lifetime Contributions to SF Scholarship was created in 1970 by the SFRA to honor lifetime contributions to SF and fantasy scholarship. The award was first named for J. O. Bailey’s pioneering book, Pilgrims through Space and Time and altered in 2019.

This year’s awardee is Takayuki Tatsumi.


Student Paper Award, Committee Remarks
Chair: Kathryn Heffner

This committee received many strong papers this year which demonstrated both creative and critical approaches to science fiction. Many of the papers that were received spoke to contemporary issues of disability, class, race, gender, sexuality and the oligarchic conditions in which we live in. However, one paper in particular offered a critical historiography of sf scholarship, an exemplary argument of intersectional feminism in utopic sf, and a charge for scholars to explore ‘witch feminist science fiction.’ The committee is happy to award Joanna Kaniewska’s “Re-enchanting the future: Witches in Feminist Science Fiction.” Kaniewska’s paper deeply interrogated the role of the feminist science fiction in popular culture and drew on scholarly texts from Lisa Yaszek, Ann and Jeff Vandermeer, Janet Fiskio, Haraway, and others. “Re-enchanting the future” is an invitation for us to explore the many layered identities of women represented in science fiction.


Mary Kay Bray Award
Chair: Nora Castle

The Mary K Bray Award Committee has the distinct pleasure tonight of awarding Mehdi Achouche this year’s prize for his review of The Wandering Earth II. Medhi’s review shined with his distinctive authorial voice and his incisive attention to detail. His intermingling of close readings of particular visual moments in the film with his analysis of the sociotechnical, historical, and political background that underpins and is imbued in the film added a richness to his piece from which his readers have greatly benefited. We look forward to reading more of his work, and congratulate him on this excellent achievement!


SFRA Book Award
Chair: Sean Guynes
Committee: Karen Hellekson, Amy Butt, and Sean Guynes (chair)

The SFRA Book Award is given to the author of the best first scholarly monograph in SF studies published in each calendar year. It’s judged by a committee panel of sff scholars representing a range of research specialties and currently includes Karen Hellekson, Amy Butt, and Sean Guynes (chair).

It is truly a great pleasure to serve on the SFRA Book Award committee and also a daunting responsibility. How does a committee choose just one book? What should that book represent? These are serious challenges for scholars who thrive on multiplicity. In discussions with the committee, I have suggested that our award winner should be chosen based on the significance of the book as an intervention into sf studies broadly. The books that win the award should be considered future required reading for scholars in the field. Our selection should also keep in mind that some of the best sf scholarship moves beyond the field and offers insights for broader critical inquiry.

Looking back at the relevant books published in the field during 2024, the committee read and considered twenty-five monographs from eleven publishers. Each book was the author’s first book-length work in sf studies. There were, of course, many critically exciting and theoretically energizing books on our nominee list that collectively testify to the vibrancy of sf scholarship today.

From among these we selected Jordan Carroll’s Speculative Whiteness, published by Minnesota, as our honorable mention. It appeared in Minnesota’s Forerunners series and offers an important study of the far right’s disturbing speculative imaginaries. Thank you to Jordan for this book.

The winner of the 2025 SFRA Book Award is Kimberly Cleveland’s Africanfuturism: African Imaginings of Other Times, Spaces, and Worlds published by Ohio University Press as part of the Africa in World History series. For those who might not know, OU Press is one of the foremost publishers of work in African Studies and Cleveland’s book is a wonderful representative of their output.

Cleveland’s Africanfuturism is, to say the least, a damn good book. It’s the most recent in a growing body of important, theoretically rigorous, and critically necessary work on African and Afro-diaspora sf and its relationship to the global literary and media landscape. Cleveland’s project undertakes the difficult task of navigating the recent explosion of scholarship on both Afrofuturism and Africanfuturism. She delineates both term’s conceptual histories and outlines critiques of Afrofuturism (as a concept) from an African perspective, and more. Cleveland goes well beyond Okorafor’s often cited concerns with Afrofuturism as the label for her own work, and brings in an astounding and admirable range of African and Afro-diaspora critics and texts, moving fluidly across media to offer a wonderfully capacious understanding of Africanfuturism. Crucially, Cleveland reorients discussions in the field to be from Africa and outlines major themes—space and time, (neo)colonialism, worldmaking, technology, religion and spirituality, and myth, among others—that bring a necessary Africanfuturist perspective to sff studies. And Cleveland does this all while resisting the temptation, so common in our scholarship, to reduce Africanfuturism to a singular thing.

There’s no doubt among the committee members that Cleveland’s Africanfuturism is required reading for the field. So thank you for writing this book, Kimberly, and for helping us collectively work through some of the tangled knots at the heart of the field today.


Thomas D. Clareson Award for Distinguished Service
Chair: Graham J. Murphy

This year the committee members for the Thomas D. Clareson Award for Distinguished Service —i.e., Graham J. Murphy (outgoing chair), Stina Attebery, and Alison Sperling—are thrilled to recognize this year’s winner, Keren Omry, a scholar whose indefatigable work has benefited not only the academic community but the SFRA organization of which we all belong.

Keren Omry earned her Ph.D. from the University of London, and she has been enriching her students’ lives as a Senior Lecturer with the Department of English Language and Literature at the University of Haifa. Her first book, Cross-Rhythms: Jazz Aesthetics in African-American Literature, published by Continuum Press, explores the crucial roles blues and jazz play in such African-American authors as James Baldwin, Ralph Ellison, Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston, and Toni Morrison. While Keren continues to explore the intersections of jazz and African-American literature, including contributions to African American Review, The Explicator, and American Literary History, an early article on cyborg performance, gender, and Octavia Butler for Phoebe: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Feminist Scholarship, Theory and Aesthetics (renamed Praxis: Journal of Gender & Cultural Critiques) perhaps foreshadowed Keren’s future scholarship in Science Fiction Studies. She has since produced sf scholarship on a range of topics, including (but not limited to) alternative futures, the juxtaposition of Nalo Hopkinson and Toni Morrison in post-9/11 global colonialism, the central function of emotional stability in Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner: 2049, the role of sympathy and metonymy in Williiam Gibson’s The Peripheral, the musical sf of Beck, Kutiman, Björk, and Amon Tobin, and an overview of Israeli Science Fiction for our very own SFRA Review. Her in-progress work, Slipping Sideways, focuses on slipstream literature and other forms of speculative fiction to address such notions as futurity, historicity, contemporaneity, and utopia. Finally, Keren has served as co-editor of The Routledge Companion to Gender and Science Fiction and, along with her fellow co-editors, has worked to inspire all of us to “put science fictional ideas into practice [… and] inspire us to create both new modes of art and new modes of kinship based on the celebration of communal activity and the politics of affinity rather than conventional ideas of individual excellence and biological identity” (41).

Keren’s commitment to service is no less impressive, particularly when it comes to this organization. She served as SFRA Vice President from 2015 to 2016, president from 2017 to 2019, and chair of the SFRA Book Award from 2019-2023. She is the current Science Fiction Division Head for our sister organization The International Association for the Fantastic in the Arts. Finally, Keren’s legacy in Science Fiction scholarship was arguably secured when she co-founded Palgrave SFF: A New Canon for Palgrave, a book series she co-edited from 2020 to 2023 that has produced 14 volumes since its debut.

In sum, the Thomas D. Clareson Award for Distinguished Service recognizes excellence in science-fiction teaching, editing, reviewing, editorial writing, publishing, organizing meetings, mentoring, and leadership in sf organizations, and Keren Omry is a distinguished recipient of this award. Thus, the Thomas D. Clareson Awards Committee takes great pleasure is presenting this much deserved award to the 2025 winner, Keren Omry.


Innovative Research Award Speech for SFRA Banquet, 2025
Chair: John Rieder

I want to thank my fellow committee members, Sumeyra Buran and Ciarán Kavanagh, for their hard work reading, evaluating, and judging the many excellent essays nominated for this award. Thanks also to everyone who nominated an essay. Without their participation in the process, this award could not happen. We did receive quite a few more nominations this year than in either of the previous two years when I was on the awards committee, and as in the previous two years, there were numerous high quality essays worthy of special recognition. Indeed, it was not just the sheer number of nominations that made this choice difficult, but the rigorous research, nuance, and argumentation that SF Studies, as a field, is currently enjoying, and which was represented so strongly by the nominated works. Our choice came down at last to Virginia L. Conn’s “Formal Fictions: ‘Chinese’ ‘Science’ ‘Fiction’ in Translation.”

Conn’s incisive argument concerning how Chinese SF is being framed and received in Anglophone literary spaces challenges assumptions about cultural authenticity, translation, and genre identity. Observing the hype generated by Cixin Liu’s winning the Hugo Award for The Three-Body Problem, amid proclamations that Liu “was the first Chinese author to win, that this was the first Chinese novel to win, that this was the first Chinese science fiction to be popular in the West: the first Chinese everything,” Conn asks what exactly do we mean by Chinese science fiction? What does it mean, more precisely, “for a historically contested genre, [science fiction], to be modified by an historically contested –national? ethnic? linguistic?—adjective?” (99)

In answer, Conn’s rigorous scholarship focuses on the problem of translatability between the genre systems and epistemologies of the Chinese and those of the English-speaking world. The way Conn then follows the twists and turns and terminological complexities of early twentieth century Chinese understanding of Western science and the implications of that understanding for ideas about the Chinese nation and its place in modernity (where “China” and “modernity” were definitely just as porous and slippery as “science”) reminded one committee member of the great historicizing work of Raymond Williams. Conn follows this tour de force survey of the history of these ideas in pre-World War II China with a description of the transformation of practices of writing and classifying science fiction under Mao, adopting the social realist policies of the USSR. Here to a certain extent a utopian element tied to fantasy replaces the technological emphasis on achieving modernity prevalent in the earlier period, but the predominant emphasis is on using sf as “a predictive model utilizing realist narratives and unremarkable technologies” (114) in concordance with the revolutionary state’s project of “bring[ing] the masses to the future through literary means” (115).

As we approach the present, understandings of the genealogy and definition of science fiction draw on different elements of this complicated history for different purposes. Overly eager translations of Chinese writing in and about the genre called science fiction in English are in danger of substituting the Anglophone world’s expectations and values for the complex ambiguities attached to its terms and self-understanding in China itself. Conn’s summary of the consequences of the argument in the final paragraph is crystal clear and powerful: “identifying Chinese SF as a specific form is a process that is inextricable from the larger English hegemony that defines literary value and practices of circulation within certain genres, “science fiction” included. Without problematizing any of the adjectives involved—“Chinese,” “science,” or “fiction”—the entire concept of the genre becomes embedded in a [false] presumption of shared vocabulary” (116).”

It is my honor to be able to recognize this important essay by awarding Virginia Conn the SFRA’s Innovative Research Award for 2025.


SFRA Lifetime Contributions Award 2025
Chair: Andy Hageman

It is a thrill and an honor to present the 2025 Award for Lifetime Contributions to Science Fiction Scholarship to Dr. Takayuki Tatsumi, Professor Emeritus at Keio University in Tokyo, Japan. Dr. Tatsumi’s research has explored a formidable range of subjects and made significant contributions to scholarship within Japan and in a global and globalizing context. His work has consistently promoted rigorous critical thinking in intellectual history and literary theory, promoting transnational dialogue through science fiction studies.

Many of us here will know Dr. Tatsumi through his 2006 book, Full Metal Apache: Transactions Between Cyberpunk Japan and Avant-Pop America. The chapters of Full Metal Apache move across creators and media. He investigates the recursive influence loops between Japan and the US in their cyberpunk representations by William Gibson among other notables. Dr. Tatsumi brings queer critique and Donna Haraway’s “A Cyborg Manifesto” into innovative approaches to J. G. Ballard’s and Richard Calder’s speculative novels. Other chapters dive into fiction by Ryūnosuke Akutagawa and Edgar Allan Poe. On the latter, Poe has been a consistent through line of Dr. Tatsumi’s critical focus and a key figure in his development of scholarship that addresses multiple audiences with a flexible awareness of how Japanese and non-Japanese scholars may respond to his theoretical insights and arguments.
In addition to his own work as a critic, Dr. Tatsumi has promoted international awareness of science fiction more generally. He co-edited the volume Robot Ghosts And Wired Dreams, which contains essays translated into English by multiple authors on a wide range of Japanese science fictional texts, covering works from the 1930s to the present. He has served on award committees for science fiction writing in both Japan and the United States; for instance, in 2007 he was on the committee that awarded the Otherwise Award (formerly known as the Tiptree Award) for work that expands and explores our understanding of gender. Throughout his career, Dr. Tatsumi has called attention, both in Japan and in the United States, not only to cyberpunk science fiction, but also to feminist science fiction.

Dr. Tatsumi has already gained considerable recognition for his work in science fiction criticism, by receiving a number of previous awards. In 1994, together with Larry McCaffrey, he won the SFRA Innovative Research Award (formerly known as the Pioneer Award) for their jointly-authored article, “Towards the Theoretical Frontiers of Fiction: From Metafiction and Cyberpunk through Avant-Pop”. In 2001, Dr. Tatsumi received the 21st Japan SF Grand Prize for his edited anthology Japanese SF Controversies: 1957-1997. And in 2010, Dr. Tatsumi received the Distinguished Scholarship Award from the International Association for the Fantastic in the Arts.
Here I have mostly focused upon the work by Dr. Tatsumi that is written in, or that has been translated into, English; but it is important to note that he has a voluminous Japanese-language bibliography. Overall, Dr. Tatsumi has advanced science fiction research in many ways: as a translator, as an editor, as an organizer and featured speaker at international conferences and conventions, and as a scholar who actively promotes collaboration among scholars. He has been a force for introducing science fiction critical theory from around the world into Japan and for infusing science fiction critical theory with Japanese perspectives, voices, and texts. One of our jury members observed the transformational power of Dr. Tatsumi as featured speaker of the 2017 Mechademia Conference at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design where he energized the audience with creative arguments that combined sharp insight with connections across borders.

Please join me and the rest of the committee (Andy Hageman and Lisa Yaszek) in congratulating Dr. Takayuki Tatsumi for his lifetime contributions to science fiction scholarship, in works that foster inclusive and pluralistic dialogue and critique, understanding, trust,
and respect.


Student Paper Award: Joanna Kaniewska

This is going to be a speech of gratitude; I’m just going to say a few “thank yous.” A full list would be very long and probably start around my parents, but I’m going to spare you that. Let’s cut to the chase: I have three big “thank you” to give.
First one goes to the dynamite duo of my supervisors, Agnieszka Kotwasińska and Paweł Frelik. Without them, I would not be standing here. They provide so much support at every step of what I do, and I cannot express my gratitude properly for that. Thank you. Please, applaud them.

The second “thank you” goes to the award committee – I’m really sorry Kathryn cannot hear it in person, but I guess she will read it afterwards… It is my educated guess that, like many people in academia, she and the other members of the committee were thinking: “Why are we doing this to ourselves? Why are we doing this, on top of everything else that we do?” I want them to know that their work is seen, it is appreciated, and it is important to me and many other people who have gotten this award before or will get it in the future. Please, also applaud them.
And the final “thank you” goes to the entire community of SFRA and to the University of Rochester. It has been said many times over the past few days, but I think it is really important to say it again. One: it is not obvious that we all gathered here. Actually, it is a kind of miracle, and I appreciate it even more after hearing about the struggle with the organization. And the second thing: having a trans-themed conference right now, in the United States, in times of fear of transgender mice and whatnot… It takes resilience, it takes courage, and I think we are all very courageous, so… Thank you for that. And please, applaud yourselves, you deserve it.


Mary Kay Bray Award: Mehdi Achouche

I am absolutely honored at receiving the Mary Kay Bray Award, and I want to thank the committee for choosing my modest contribution. I also want to thank my editor, Leimar Garcia-Siino, who had great advice for me and helped make the review stronger, leaner and much more to the point. She did a great job. I loved writing this review, and I do believe reviews are and should be seen as a crucial form of academic writing, which can teach a lot to readers but also to their writers. Thank you again.


The SFRA Book Award: Kimberly Cleveland

It is an honor to be recognized with the SFRA Book Award for Africanfuturism: African Imaginings of Other Times, Spaces, and Worlds (Ohio University Press, 2024). I want to express my gratitude to the Book Award Committee, chaired by Sean Guynes, and to SFRA President Hugh O’Connell. It truly takes a village to bring a publication to fruition. At Ohio University Press, I extend my appreciation to Beth Pratt, Rick Huard, Sally Welch, Tyler Balli, and Africa in World History series editors Betsy Schmidt and Dave Robinson. I also want to thank Ainehi Edoro-Glines for her wonderful foreword, and my colleagues in the School of Art & Design at Georgia State University. Lastly, I am forever grateful to my family for their support.

I did much of the work on this publication during the Covid pandemic when many people around the world were isolated, separated from friends and loved ones, shut in their homes, and uncertain how long the situation was going to last. I found myself thinking a lot about the future, and how speculative expression can help societies meet the challenges of the present and the yet to come. In the first Pan-African anthology of science fiction by African authors, the volume’s editor expressed why it was crucial for African creatives to generate speculative interpretations in light of the continent’s position in the world order: “SciFi is the only genre that enables African writers to envision a future from our perspective. . . . The value of this envisioning for any third-world country, or in our case continent, cannot be overstated nor negated. If you can’t see and relay an understandable vision of the future, your future will be co-opted by someone else’s vision, one that will not necessarily have your best interests at heart.” Indeed, it is African-oriented real-world possibilities that frequently galvanize African creatives to generate their speculative work and which, consequently, may positively influence audiences going forward. Africanfuturism illuminates Africa’s place in the worlds of science fiction and fantasy, and how Africanfuturist work builds on the continent’s own traditions of speculative expression. It was a pleasure to highlight the rich contributions of African intellectuals and creatives in this study. Being recognized with the SFRA Book Award is a great honor, and reaffirms the importance of acknowledging and exploring African visions of future worlds.


Honorable Mention: Jordan S. Carroll

I am grateful to receive the honorable mention for the SFRA Book Award for Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right. I’d like to thank the SFRA and the award selection committee. Let me also take this opportunity to express my appreciation for my editor Leah Pennywark and everyone else at the University of Minnesota Press’s Forerunners Series.

We live in a moment when the far right fights for control over our futures. This means that as science fiction scholars we have two crucial tasks: we must face the long history of fascist elements within the science fiction field, and we must continue to defend the genre’s emancipatory and utopian potential from those who would extinguish it. Thank you all for this recognition, and I hope that this inspires others to take up the struggle against fascism in science fiction culture.


Innovative Research Award: Virginia L. Conn

Thank you, John, Hugh, and members of the awards committee; and thank you, too, to everyone here tonight, here with us virtually, and here with us in spirit. In many ways, the essay being recognized is about what kinds of communities we build, belong to, and recognize in the first place, and being recognized by a community of such incisive, critical scholars is quite an honor.

In the opening to my essay, I ask: what does it mean to identify a text as “Chinese science fiction” in the first place? Is “Chinese” a linguistic descriptor? An ethnic identification? A national origin? An implication of certain political ideologies? Simply a convenient publishing signifier? It’s certainly true that, no matter how one defines it, something called “Chinese science fiction” is having somewhat of a global moment, but in that very inflection of a literary genre as somehow recognizably othered, we implicitly create dialectical literary and publishing communities that often go unremarked. I want to remark on them here.

We are all of us here tonight part of at least one community—the SFRA. Membership and cohesion within any community requires certain elements, and ours is no exception: shared linguistic forms, shared regulative rules, and shared cultural concepts. If you don’t speak the language, you might say, no one can understand where you’re coming from.

But having a shared point of reference is increasingly difficult in a place and time such as ours, where reality seems to be outpacing fiction in terms of its almost hallucinatory strangeness. Chinese actually has a specific word for this phenomenon: “chaohuan,” typically rendered in English as the “ultra-unreal” The literal meaning of “chaohuan” is “surpassing the unreal” or “surpassing the imaginary,” and it’s increasingly a feature of modern life no matter which country you’re in. Many of us feel that the world we knew even a year ago no longer exists. Our institutions are in flux. Academia itself is increasingly precarious. The shared points of reference that used to—or at least we imagine used to—define at least national citizenship, if not individual politics, have become increasingly defined by isolationist beliefs and conceptual silos. Where does that lead us as scholars of science fiction?
I don’t want to pretend that all of us here in this room are united in our beliefs. We’re not, and I think that’s a good thing, ultimately. But what I do believe we’re united in is our conviction that science fiction can provide us with the tools to imagine something different. It doesn’t even have to be better! But different.
Being able to imagine alternatives—futures, social or economic or political outcomes, communities—is the first step to making those alternatives actionable. We cannot build what we cannot imagine. By reading, writing, and studying alternatives to our current reality, each of us has already taken the first step towards changing that reality.

Imagining is only the first step, of course. But every change begins with a first step. And as we continue to step forward into the future together, I hope that that journey is one that’s expansive enough to imagine possibilities for trans people, immigrants, the shamefully unnamed victims of genocide, different languages and literary traditions, and I hope we’re brave enough not to flinch in the face of such differences while also being brave enough to see what cuts across community boundaries. Thank you again.


The Thomas D. Clareson Award: Keren Omry

It’s an incredible honor to be awarded the Thomas D. Clareson Award for Distinguished Service. I’ve been coming to SFRA for 15 years and this has been without question one of the most significant communities I’ve been part of. I’ve held some offices, been on many of the committees, edited some SF volumes, I’ve been the second reader for quite a few of your all’s work, and throughout I am overwhelmed by the generosity, collegiality, professionalism and sense of humour of this SFS community. It’s an ongoing privilege to do what I can to keep it going.

Teaching SF in Israel, advocating for and supervising research in speculative fiction, supporting science fiction events and activities in my region can often feel like a frivolous luxury. Living where I do makes the potential awfulness of reality a very real experience. There’s nothing hypothetical, or abstract, or political about rushing to a bomb shelter at 4:00 in the morning with your kids, again. And mine is a lite version of living in war. But then, later that day – this was during lockdown so everyone was working from home – I would meet my students on zoom and talk about Afrofuturism, or utopian fiction, or time travel. Not everyone realizes this but at the University of Haifa, where I teach, about 47% of the student body are Arab Israelis, Druze, and Palestinians. In the English department, which I chair, it’s more like 75-80% Arabs. This is no accident. For many of my students, most non-native speakers, English language offers a levelling ground which reshuffles the demographic hierarchies, and they all grapple with ideas from a rare but equal footing. Think about this: with missiles flying overhead, people fleeing their homes, hostages, refugees, soldiers and innocents dying around you daily, I get to sit in a classroom with Muslims and Jews and Christians, together, and talk about Earthseed, and Lagoon, and Man in the High Castle. I don’t need to tell you all this but Science Fiction matters. Together my students and I can imagine other possibilities, other ways of being together. Through science fiction my students can talk to one another about the real problems, the fears and aspirations that guide them. This is not always easy. But it is always rewarding. And with each SF seminar paper that I mark or dissertation that I send out to the world, connecting my students to realities outside our lived experience and to you all, your scholarship and your ideas and your professional support, I am reminded that there’s nothing frivolous about promoting speculation around the world.

With deep and humble gratitude thank you the Clareson Committee and to you all.


The SFRA Award for Lifetime Contributions to SF Scholarship: Takayuki Tatsumi

Acceptance speech is a peculiar literary genre. It is usually considered to be a form of acknowledgment. However, in receiving this special SFRA Award for Lifetime Contributions to SF Scholarship, I feel obliged to begin by describing quite a few coincidences that made possible my long engagement with science fiction as a way of life.

In the early 1960s I started reading science fiction as an elementary school student. The first novel I read as a first grader was The Lost World by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, originally published in 1912, in which dinosaurs that strode the earth some 170 million years ago are still alive and well now deep in the heart of the amazon rainforest. Without this book I would not have been fascinated with Japanese “kaiju” as represented by Godzilla, as well as a master of fantasy and science fiction Ray Bradbury, whose short story “The Fog Horn” (1951) was a remote origin of today’s monsterverse. While Leslie Fiedler discussed the return of the vanishing American in his magnum opus, I have always speculated on the dramatic return of the vanishing species.

The early 1960s coincided with the Japanese period of High Growth in which the defeated nation experienced a miraculous resurrection. As I recollected in the acknowledgments section of my monograph Full Metal Apache (Duke UP, 2006), as a child in downtown Tokyo I was shocked by the destruction of the Institute for Nature Study in my neighborhood, an incredibly beautiful botanical garden, right in the path of construction for the Tokyo Metropolitan Expressway. Civilization destroyed nature. My favorite playground was invaded by the ugly machinery that deformed its original landscape. However, I soon found myself enjoying the in-between atmosphere of the construction, discovering a new playground in the chaotic fusion of the natural forest with the high-tech expressway. It is this primal scene that induced me later to find Leo Marx’s theory of “machine in the garden” and J. G. Ballard’s idea of “technological landscape” very intriguing. The post-apocalyptic Tokyo as described in Otomo Katsuhiro’s Akira (1982-90) was my own city. Therefore, majoring in American Renaissance writers in the graduate school in the late 1970s, I kept reading science fiction and cutting-edge critical theories as championed by Darko Suvin and Fredric Jameson in Science Fiction Studies.

In 1984, a Fulbright scholarship enabled me to study at Cornell University as a Ph.D. student. It is Dr. Elizabeth Ann Hull, one of the former presidents of the SFRA, who kindly invited me to join the annual SFRA meeting held at Kent State University in the summer of 1985, when that year’s Pilgrim Award was given to Samuel “Chip” Delany, most of whose works I had long perused and admired. Thus, after that first encounter with Chip at Kent State I conducted an interview with him at Novacon in Pennsylvania in the fall of the same year, and showed the transcription to Professor Henry Louis “Skip” Gates, Jr, one of my Cornell teachers whose African-American Literature course reading list included Chip’s The Einstein Intersection. He enthusiastically recommended my Delany interview for publication in Diacritics in 1986 (published in Vol.16, No.3) and Professor Donald “Mac” Hassler of Kent State University generously published the revised version of my term paper on The Einstein Intersection in Extrapolation in 1987 (Vol.28, No.3). The year of 1985 saw the genesis of my SFRA days.

In the meanwhile, 1985 coincided with the rise of the cyberpunk movement, in which I was recruited by Stephen P. Brown, editor-in-chief of the then-new critical magazine Science Fiction Eye. With him as non-academic mentor I interviewed William Gibson, Bruce Sterling, John Shirley and Donna Haraway, making every effort to build an interface between western science fiction and Japanese science fiction. I can’t forget the moment I first talked with John Shirley as one of the guest writers of the 1986 annual conference of SFRA held at San Diego State University, together with Veronica Hollinger.

Since the 1990s I have luckily collaborated with a number of academic friends. First, I joined forces with my longest collaborator Professor Larry McCaffery of San Diego State University, the missionary of postmodernism and editor of cyberpunk casebook Storming the Reality Studio (1991), to promote the literary and cultural strategy of Avant-Pop, negotiating between the cutting-edge writers and artists of the US and Japan, as is found in our co-edited New Japanese Fiction issue of Review of Contemporary Fiction (2002). Larry and I feel very proud that our collaborated article “Toward the Frontiers of ‘Fiction’: From Metafiction and Cyberpunk, through Avant-Pop,” published in Science Fiction Eye #12 in 1993, was selected as the winner of the 5th SFRA Pioneer Award in 1994. After the award ceremony Joan Gordon generously invited me and my wife Mari to her house in Long Island.

Second, it was in the early 21st century that I co-edited with Christopher Bolton and Istvan Csicsery-Ronay the first-ever textbook of Japanese science fiction entitled Robot Ghosts and Wired Dreams: Japanese Science Fiction from Origins to Anime in 2007 (U of Minnesota P) including major contributors such as Susan Napier,Livia Monet, Sharalyn Orbaugh, William Gardner, Mari Kotani, Hiroki Azuma and Tamaki Saito. Since the first-ever World Science Fiction Convention in Asia, nicknamed “Nipponcon,” took place also in 2007 in Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture, I chaired an SF scholarship panel with Bolton and Napier as panelists.

In the 2010s Thomas Lamarre and Frenchy Lunning became new collaborators. Without the friendship with Tom the “Parallel Futures” project (2012~) of the University of Minnesota Press, which published the American editions of the masterpieces of Japanese speculative fiction, that is, Chiaki Kawamata’s Death Sentences, Yoshio Aramaki’s The Sacred Era and Mariko Ohara’s Hybrid Child, would not have been possible. Without the partnership with Frenchy, editor-in-chief of the Mechademia: The Second Arc project, I could not have guest-edited the special Japanese science fiction issue in 2021.

Lastly, I cannot ignore another secret collaborator Professor Darko Suvin, distinguished scholar-critic and one of the founding fathers of Science Fiction Studies. As I disclosed in my own afterword to the anthology Science Fiction Controversies in Japan (2000), the winner of the 21st Japan SF Grand Prize, the Japanese equivalent of Nebula, it was in the early 1990s, when Darko was visiting Japan very often, that he suggested to me that someday we co-edit a collection of legendary but still controversial essays written by Japanese science fiction writers and critics. Without his suggestion I could not have come up with the idea of compiling my own anthology in 2000, which is a small step for me but a giant leap for transnational science fiction; the publication of Science Fiction Controversies in Japan in 2000 invited a number of transnational scholars and students to see and work with me in Japan and/or in the United States. I’m not sure if Darko still remembers what we talked about in Tokyo more than three decades ago. Nonetheless, with the special Science Fictions issue of Mechademia: Second Arc (Fall 2021), featuring a lot of controversial articles, I feel I could partially carry out the promise with Darko.

The science fiction we used to know came to be gradually metamorphosed into something else in the wake of cyberpunkish techno-orientalism coinciding with the discourses of “Japan as No. 1,” “Pax Japonica,” and “Cool Japan” in the past four decades. As fin de siècle Western literature enjoyed the taste of Japonisme around the year of 1900, the new turn of the century saw the rise of the “Asian,” and especially “Japanesque” mode in science fiction, empowering Japanese science fiction as such and transgressing the generic boundaries between prose, manga, anime, and gaming. At this point science fiction critics in Japan are prescient; in his ambitious article “Science Fiction as a Literary and Cultural Strategy” (1963), Takashi Ishikawa defined science fiction as “the literature destabilizing the sense of normalcy” much earlier than Darko Suvin’s “cognitive estrangement” defined in Metamorphoses of Science Fiction (1979) whereas Yoshio Aramaki completed a history of Euro-American science fiction in the 1968 much earlier than Brian Aldiss’s Billion Year Spree (1973).

In the third decade of the 21st century, it is getting more and more difficult to witness the present of science fiction, not because it covers a variety of literary and cultural representations but because the rapid evolution of AI made it hard for us to distinguish the imaginary worlds science fiction has long described and the mostly science fictional world we are inhabiting now. Nonetheless, I’m convinced that the more paranoid the current president gets, the more poignant science fiction criticism becomes.

I have so far emphasized the significance of collaboration, because in the introduction to my newly co-edited collection of essays with Yoshio Aramaki The Art of Science Fiction Criticism published in 2014 (Takanashi Shobo Publishers), I theorized the “collaborative imagination” since Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein as the archetype of science fiction. Without her conversation with Lord Byron, Percy Bysshe Shelley and John William Polidori she could not have come up with the idea of artificial intelligence. Likewise, without my discussion with SF scholar critics I could not have demonstrated transactions between Cyberpunk Japan and Avant-Pop America. I strongly hope to further develop my critical collaborations with SFRA. A million thanks for providing me with this prestigious award!